https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388059 The Karnataka High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the Tribunal's decision to overturn the Commissioner's order due to lack of concrete evidence supporting duty evasion allegations by the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of substantial evidence and meticulous evaluation, highlighting limitations on re-evaluating evidence in appeals under Section 35G of the Act. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Nov 2019 16:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388059 The Karnataka High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the Tribunal's decision to overturn the Commissioner's order due to lack of concrete evidence supporting duty evasion allegations by the assessee. The Court emphasized the importance of substantial evidence and meticulous evaluation, highlighting limitations on re-evaluating evidence in appeals under Section 35G of the Act. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388059