https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388058 Ketamine Hydrochloride was treated as a preparation of Ketamine and therefore within the NDPS Act, since psychotropic substances in the Schedule and their salts or preparations are covered; reliance on the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 did not exclude NDPS liability on the facts stated. The alleged illegal detention, absence of FIR, and objections to the search and seizure process were not accepted as grounds for bail, as the prosecution sequence and Section 41(2) authorisation were found sufficient at the bail stage. Applying the twin conditions in Section 37, the Court noted admissions, manufacturing activity, false identity documents, and delivery of contraband, and found that the statutory requirements for bail were not satisfied. en-us Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2019 06:12:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388058 Ketamine Hydrochloride was treated as a preparation of Ketamine and therefore within the NDPS Act, since psychotropic substances in the Schedule and their salts or preparations are covered; reliance on the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 did not exclude NDPS liability on the facts stated. The alleged illegal detention, absence of FIR, and objections to the search and seizure process were not accepted as grounds for bail, as the prosecution sequence and Section 41(2) authorisation were found sufficient at the bail stage. Applying the twin conditions in Section 37, the Court noted admissions, manufacturing activity, false identity documents, and delivery of contraband, and found that the statutory requirements for bail were not satisfied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388058