<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 304 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388055</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on handling expenses, restacking/reconditioning expenses, and EDP expenses within the normal period of limitation. The demands for miscellaneous expenses, bank charges, CASM expenses, and freight charges were set aside. All penalties were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the original authority for recalculation of the demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 06:11:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 304 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388055</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on handling expenses, restacking/reconditioning expenses, and EDP expenses within the normal period of limitation. The demands for miscellaneous expenses, bank charges, CASM expenses, and freight charges were set aside. All penalties were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the original authority for recalculation of the demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>