<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 303 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388054</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeals, stating that the appellant is not entitled to a refund of the excise duty paid on goods procured from the DTA, due to the lack of specific provisions in the SEZ Rules and Central Excise Rules, and the failure to challenge the duty assessment. The appeals were dismissed on both merits and jurisdictional grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 303 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388054</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeals, stating that the appellant is not entitled to a refund of the excise duty paid on goods procured from the DTA, due to the lack of specific provisions in the SEZ Rules and Central Excise Rules, and the failure to challenge the duty assessment. The appeals were dismissed on both merits and jurisdictional grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>