https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388036 The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi due to the continuous absence of the appellants, despite repeated notices served. The tribunal found that the appellants' failure to appear or provide representation constituted non-prosecution, leading to the dismissal of the appeals in accordance with legal principles outlined in a Supreme Court case law. The judgment emphasized the importance of active participation and representation in legal proceedings, highlighting that lack of valid reasons for absence does not justify adjournments and can result in dismissal for non-prosecution. Applications for restoration were not entertained due to the absence of valid grounds for adjournment. en-us Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2019 06:11:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388036 The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi due to the continuous absence of the appellants, despite repeated notices served. The tribunal found that the appellants' failure to appear or provide representation constituted non-prosecution, leading to the dismissal of the appeals in accordance with legal principles outlined in a Supreme Court case law. The judgment emphasized the importance of active participation and representation in legal proceedings, highlighting that lack of valid reasons for absence does not justify adjournments and can result in dismissal for non-prosecution. Applications for restoration were not entertained due to the absence of valid grounds for adjournment. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388036