<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 284 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed an early hearing request and directed that the appeal be listed out of turn with other appeals raising the same issue on service tax on renting of immovable property. The order was limited to hearing arrangement and consolidation for convenient disposal, and it did not decide the substantive tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 06:10:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 284 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed an early hearing request and directed that the appeal be listed out of turn with other appeals raising the same issue on service tax on renting of immovable property. The order was limited to hearing arrangement and consolidation for convenient disposal, and it did not decide the substantive tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>