<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 53 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20322</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80HH was required to be computed on net income of the industrial undertaking, not on gross profit, because section 80B(5) defines gross total income as income computed under the Act before Chapter VI-A deductions. The earlier broad approach in Cloth Traders was no longer applicable after the Constitution Bench in Distributors (Baroda), and the same net-income principle was reiterated in P. K. Jhaveri. Cambay Electric Supply was treated as supporting the view that similar deduction provisions operate on a computed net figure rather than gross receipts. The issue was therefore resolved in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:50:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 53 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20322</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80HH was required to be computed on net income of the industrial undertaking, not on gross profit, because section 80B(5) defines gross total income as income computed under the Act before Chapter VI-A deductions. The earlier broad approach in Cloth Traders was no longer applicable after the Constitution Bench in Distributors (Baroda), and the same net-income principle was reiterated in P. K. Jhaveri. Cambay Electric Supply was treated as supporting the view that similar deduction provisions operate on a computed net figure rather than gross receipts. The issue was therefore resolved in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>