https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20320 The court upheld the decision to retain the seized gold pending further investigation, dismissing the non-resident Indian petitioner's request for release. Emphasizing the need for proper inquiry into ownership, the court deemed premature any conclusions on the gold's origin. The judgment highlighted the importance of preventing unfair advantage and preserving evidence for potential legal proceedings. The writ appeal was dismissed, stressing the necessity for resolving the ownership dispute through appropriate legal channels. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:47:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20320 The court upheld the decision to retain the seized gold pending further investigation, dismissing the non-resident Indian petitioner's request for release. Emphasizing the need for proper inquiry into ownership, the court deemed premature any conclusions on the gold's origin. The judgment highlighted the importance of preventing unfair advantage and preserving evidence for potential legal proceedings. The writ appeal was dismissed, stressing the necessity for resolving the ownership dispute through appropriate legal channels. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20320