<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 527 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284191</link>
    <description>Suspension pay and allowances for an officer acquitted with benefit of doubt were addressed under the bank&#039;s regulations and manual. Regulation 15(1) applied only where the officer was fully exonerated or the suspension was unjustifiable; otherwise Regulation 15(2) governed and left the proportion of pay and allowances to the competent authority. Clause 22(8) of the Manual specifically dealt with acquittal in criminal proceedings and was treated as relevant guidance for applying Regulation 15(2). On that footing, acquittal with benefit of doubt did not amount to full exoneration, and the High Court&#039;s relief was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 14:15:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 527 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284191</link>
      <description>Suspension pay and allowances for an officer acquitted with benefit of doubt were addressed under the bank&#039;s regulations and manual. Regulation 15(1) applied only where the officer was fully exonerated or the suspension was unjustifiable; otherwise Regulation 15(2) governed and left the proportion of pay and allowances to the competent authority. Clause 22(8) of the Manual specifically dealt with acquittal in criminal proceedings and was treated as relevant guidance for applying Regulation 15(2). On that footing, acquittal with benefit of doubt did not amount to full exoneration, and the High Court&#039;s relief was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>