<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 275 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388026</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the assessment order for the assessment year 2013-2014, finding that the petitioner had sufficient opportunities to provide necessary details but failed to do so. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to appeal before the Appellate Authority within two weeks, allowing for interim relief during the appeal process. No costs were imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 12:22:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 275 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388026</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the assessment order for the assessment year 2013-2014, finding that the petitioner had sufficient opportunities to provide necessary details but failed to do so. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to appeal before the Appellate Authority within two weeks, allowing for interim relief during the appeal process. No costs were imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>