<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 268 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed mark to market (MTM) losses as expenditure for a stockbroking company, overturning lower authorities&#039; disallowance. It held that MTM losses, based on accounting standards, were not contingent or notional, contrary to the CBDT instruction. Precedents supported treating such losses as business expenditure, emphasizing they were not merely notional. The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to delete the disallowed deduction, highlighting the distinction between contingent business losses and notional losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 268 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed mark to market (MTM) losses as expenditure for a stockbroking company, overturning lower authorities&#039; disallowance. It held that MTM losses, based on accounting standards, were not contingent or notional, contrary to the CBDT instruction. Precedents supported treating such losses as business expenditure, emphasizing they were not merely notional. The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to delete the disallowed deduction, highlighting the distinction between contingent business losses and notional losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>