<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 266 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made under section 68 in assessments reopened based on alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a direct connection between the reason for reopening assessments and any subsequent income additions, citing legal precedents. The decision underscored the importance of following established legal principles in reassessments, ultimately leading to the deletion of the disputed additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 12:12:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 266 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made under section 68 in assessments reopened based on alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a direct connection between the reason for reopening assessments and any subsequent income additions, citing legal precedents. The decision underscored the importance of following established legal principles in reassessments, ultimately leading to the deletion of the disputed additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>