<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 262 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the notice under Section 148 for reopening assessments, allowed deductions for EPF and ESI contributions made before the return filing due date, and confirmed the disallowance of the higher depreciation rate claimed by the assessee. The appeals were partly allowed, providing relief on the EPF and ESI contributions issue while dismissing the other grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 262 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the notice under Section 148 for reopening assessments, allowed deductions for EPF and ESI contributions made before the return filing due date, and confirmed the disallowance of the higher depreciation rate claimed by the assessee. The appeals were partly allowed, providing relief on the EPF and ESI contributions issue while dismissing the other grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>