<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 892 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284190</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were not justified. The tribunal noted that there was no adverse material supporting the allegation of unaccounted production of yarn and unrecorded investment in stock. Therefore, both additions of gross profit were deemed unjustified and deleted for the assessment year 2006-07.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 11:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 892 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284190</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were not justified. The tribunal noted that there was no adverse material supporting the allegation of unaccounted production of yarn and unrecorded investment in stock. Therefore, both additions of gross profit were deemed unjustified and deleted for the assessment year 2006-07.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>