https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388005 Non-bailable warrants were kept in abeyance to permit the petitioner to approach the trial court for cancellation and other relief, as the record did not conclusively establish service of summons and there was a reasonable apprehension of arrest before that step could be taken. Anticipatory bail was refused because the allegations disclosed serious economic offences involving fraud, forgery, conspiracy, and substantial financial loss; the Court treated pre-arrest bail as an extraordinary remedy to be used sparingly, especially in such cases. The petitioner was left to seek appropriate relief before the trial court, which was to consider the matter uninfluenced by these observations. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Nov 2019 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388005 Non-bailable warrants were kept in abeyance to permit the petitioner to approach the trial court for cancellation and other relief, as the record did not conclusively establish service of summons and there was a reasonable apprehension of arrest before that step could be taken. Anticipatory bail was refused because the allegations disclosed serious economic offences involving fraud, forgery, conspiracy, and substantial financial loss; the Court treated pre-arrest bail as an extraordinary remedy to be used sparingly, especially in such cases. The petitioner was left to seek appropriate relief before the trial court, which was to consider the matter uninfluenced by these observations. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388005