https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387993 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision that the imported reformate was correctly classified as an input under CCR, 2004, and not as Motor Spirit commonly known as petrol. The judgment emphasized the importance of thorough technical analysis and expertise in determining the classification of imported products under relevant regulations, favoring detailed refinery test reports over the Chemical Examiner's report. en-us Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Nov 2019 09:40:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387993 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision that the imported reformate was correctly classified as an input under CCR, 2004, and not as Motor Spirit commonly known as petrol. The judgment emphasized the importance of thorough technical analysis and expertise in determining the classification of imported products under relevant regulations, favoring detailed refinery test reports over the Chemical Examiner's report. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387993