<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 235 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, finding the restriction on utilizing CENVAT Credit post-default in monthly duty payment invalid. Citing precedents and a High Court decision, the Tribunal deemed the restriction unconstitutional and unreasonable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed, providing relief to the Appellants in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 235 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, finding the restriction on utilizing CENVAT Credit post-default in monthly duty payment invalid. Citing precedents and a High Court decision, the Tribunal deemed the restriction unconstitutional and unreasonable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed, providing relief to the Appellants in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>