<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 228 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387979</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the declaration of the C form as obsolete and invalid. However, the court highlighted suspicions regarding transactions between the parties, leaving room for the authorities to take legal action if necessary. Compliance with the law was emphasized in dealing with the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 08:28:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 228 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387979</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the declaration of the C form as obsolete and invalid. However, the court highlighted suspicions regarding transactions between the parties, leaving room for the authorities to take legal action if necessary. Compliance with the law was emphasized in dealing with the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>