<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 227 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387978</link>
    <description>The petition challenging recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, based on assessment orders for multiple financial years regarding the taxability of obtaining Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) from the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) against land and tenements transfer was disposed of. The recovery demands for the assessment years 2008-09, 2010-11, and 2012-13 were stayed pending the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on the petitioner&#039;s appeal against an earlier court order. The Assistant Government Pleader assured no enforcement of recovery demands until the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The case underscores the complexity of tax laws and the interplay between lower and higher courts in resolving tax disputes effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 227 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387978</link>
      <description>The petition challenging recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, based on assessment orders for multiple financial years regarding the taxability of obtaining Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) from the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) against land and tenements transfer was disposed of. The recovery demands for the assessment years 2008-09, 2010-11, and 2012-13 were stayed pending the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on the petitioner&#039;s appeal against an earlier court order. The Assistant Government Pleader assured no enforcement of recovery demands until the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The case underscores the complexity of tax laws and the interplay between lower and higher courts in resolving tax disputes effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>