<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1584 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284185</link>
    <description>The appeals challenged the Tribunal&#039;s decision on trading additions made under Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the average gross profit rate over five years should be considered at 3.91%. Consequently, the appeals were allowed based on this average rate, setting aside the addition sustained for the assessment year 2006-07 but upholding it for the assessment year 2005-06.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 08:26:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1584 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284185</link>
      <description>The appeals challenged the Tribunal&#039;s decision on trading additions made under Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the average gross profit rate over five years should be considered at 3.91%. Consequently, the appeals were allowed based on this average rate, setting aside the addition sustained for the assessment year 2006-07 but upholding it for the assessment year 2005-06.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>