<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1651 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284182</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by applying the Bright Line Test and to reconsider the deduction claim for Customs Duty paid under protest. However, the levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 08:26:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1651 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284182</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by applying the Bright Line Test and to reconsider the deduction claim for Customs Duty paid under protest. However, the levy of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>