<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 80 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20306</link>
    <description>The High Court held that Section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies to corporate bodies as the term &quot;person&quot; includes companies. The court rejected the argument that the provision only pertains to individuals. Additionally, the court declined to address the issue of the capacity in which a payment was made, deeming it a factual matter. The decision favored the Revenue over the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 80 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20306</link>
      <description>The High Court held that Section 40(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies to corporate bodies as the term &quot;person&quot; includes companies. The court rejected the argument that the provision only pertains to individuals. Additionally, the court declined to address the issue of the capacity in which a payment was made, deeming it a factual matter. The decision favored the Revenue over the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>