https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387971 The Delhi HC required the revenue to file an affidavit within two weeks disclosing the number and status of pending refund claims in Delhi, the reasons for delays including claims pending beyond sixty days, and the status of provisional refunds under Rule 91(2) of the CGST and DGST Rules. The Court also allowed the petitioner two weeks to place on record the communication rejecting interest on the refund, along with other relevant documents, and granted the respondents two weeks thereafter to reply. Respondent No.5 was exempted from future appearance, and the matter was listed for further consideration. en-us Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387971 The Delhi HC required the revenue to file an affidavit within two weeks disclosing the number and status of pending refund claims in Delhi, the reasons for delays including claims pending beyond sixty days, and the status of provisional refunds under Rule 91(2) of the CGST and DGST Rules. The Court also allowed the petitioner two weeks to place on record the communication rejecting interest on the refund, along with other relevant documents, and granted the respondents two weeks thereafter to reply. Respondent No.5 was exempted from future appearance, and the matter was listed for further consideration. Case-Laws GST Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387971