<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 201 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 9,91,425/- to the assessee&#039;s income under Section 40(A)(3) due to lack of evidence proving business transactions with a supplier. Additionally, the initial disallowance of Rs. 16,35,549/- was enhanced to Rs. 1,63,55,491/- as the assessee failed to substantiate cash purchases. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decisions, dismissing the appeal and confirming both additions under Section 40(A)(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 15:45:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=593007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 201 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 9,91,425/- to the assessee&#039;s income under Section 40(A)(3) due to lack of evidence proving business transactions with a supplier. Additionally, the initial disallowance of Rs. 16,35,549/- was enhanced to Rs. 1,63,55,491/- as the assessee failed to substantiate cash purchases. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decisions, dismissing the appeal and confirming both additions under Section 40(A)(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>