<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 184 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387935</link>
    <description>International inbound roaming services supplied in India to subscribers of foreign telecom operators were treated as export of service because the contract was with, and consideration was received from, the foreign telecom provider, which was the contractual recipient. Following earlier Tribunal decisions, the services were held not exigible to service tax, and consequential rebate or refund was allowed. On refund, the Tribunal held that unjust enrichment does not defeat claims arising from exported services under the statutory refund framework. The impugned orders were set aside and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 184 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387935</link>
      <description>International inbound roaming services supplied in India to subscribers of foreign telecom operators were treated as export of service because the contract was with, and consideration was received from, the foreign telecom provider, which was the contractual recipient. Following earlier Tribunal decisions, the services were held not exigible to service tax, and consequential rebate or refund was allowed. On refund, the Tribunal held that unjust enrichment does not defeat claims arising from exported services under the statutory refund framework. The impugned orders were set aside and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>