<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 179 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387930</link>
    <description>The delay condonation application for filing the appeal, due to a 107-day delay, was rejected by the Tribunal. The appellant failed to provide convincing reasons for the delay, with vague explanations and lack of sufficient cause preventing timely appeal filing. Despite attributing the delay to staff absence, the Tribunal found the application lacking in specifics regarding when and how the appellant became aware of the order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 10:40:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 179 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387930</link>
      <description>The delay condonation application for filing the appeal, due to a 107-day delay, was rejected by the Tribunal. The appellant failed to provide convincing reasons for the delay, with vague explanations and lack of sufficient cause preventing timely appeal filing. Despite attributing the delay to staff absence, the Tribunal found the application lacking in specifics regarding when and how the appellant became aware of the order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>