<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 78 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20293</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, against the Revenue, in a case involving the withdrawal of development rebate for assessment years 1961-62 and 1962-63, and entitlement to development rebate for the assessment year 1963-64. The Court held that the withdrawal of the rebate was not justified as the transfer of business to another entity was valid despite a minor cash balance omission. Additionally, the assessee was entitled to the development rebate for the year 1963-64, as the transfer of machinery was part of the business succession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:52:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 78 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20293</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, against the Revenue, in a case involving the withdrawal of development rebate for assessment years 1961-62 and 1962-63, and entitlement to development rebate for the assessment year 1963-64. The Court held that the withdrawal of the rebate was not justified as the transfer of business to another entity was valid despite a minor cash balance omission. Additionally, the assessee was entitled to the development rebate for the year 1963-64, as the transfer of machinery was part of the business succession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>