<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 811 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284163</link>
    <description>The Court concluded that since the initial rectification application had been dismissed, the subsequent application seeking the same relief was also bound to be dismissed. Therefore, the Court found no legal question warranting consideration and decided to return the reference unanswered, indicating that no further deliberation was necessary in this case regarding the rejection of miscellaneous applications seeking rectification of previous orders under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 18:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 811 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284163</link>
      <description>The Court concluded that since the initial rectification application had been dismissed, the subsequent application seeking the same relief was also bound to be dismissed. Therefore, the Court found no legal question warranting consideration and decided to return the reference unanswered, indicating that no further deliberation was necessary in this case regarding the rejection of miscellaneous applications seeking rectification of previous orders under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>