<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 63 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20292</link>
    <description>Immovable property contributed by partners as capital becomes partnership property without requiring a registered instrument under the Registration Act, 1908, and the firm&#039;s claim to depreciation on the building is not defeated by the absence of registration in its name. In relation to the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Ordinance, 1975, a declaration concerning seized material depends on the books or documents belonging to the declarant and being seized in a search, not on the search having taken place in the declarant&#039;s own premises; on the stated facts, a declaration under section 3 was unavailable and section 8(1) did not apply outside section 3 declarations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 63 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20292</link>
      <description>Immovable property contributed by partners as capital becomes partnership property without requiring a registered instrument under the Registration Act, 1908, and the firm&#039;s claim to depreciation on the building is not defeated by the absence of registration in its name. In relation to the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Ordinance, 1975, a declaration concerning seized material depends on the books or documents belonging to the declarant and being seized in a search, not on the search having taken place in the declarant&#039;s own premises; on the stated facts, a declaration under section 3 was unavailable and section 8(1) did not apply outside section 3 declarations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>