<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 140 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387891</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions made on account of unaccounted purchase of jewellery and cash shortage. The appellant successfully argued that the cash shortage was due to expenses and was used in excess stock of jewellery. The Tribunal held that the cash shortage could be adjusted against unaccounted purchase of jewellery, as the Revenue failed to provide evidence of the cash being utilized elsewhere.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 06:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 140 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387891</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions made on account of unaccounted purchase of jewellery and cash shortage. The appellant successfully argued that the cash shortage was due to expenses and was used in excess stock of jewellery. The Tribunal held that the cash shortage could be adjusted against unaccounted purchase of jewellery, as the Revenue failed to provide evidence of the cash being utilized elsewhere.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>