<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 76 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20287</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the interest accrued to the minor son should not be included in the net wealth of the assessee under section 4(1)(a)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act. The court emphasized that only the assets transferred, not their accretions, should be considered for inclusion. The judgment favored a strict interpretation of the law without extending the fiction beyond its clear wording, citing relevant precedents to support this interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:34:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 76 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20287</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the interest accrued to the minor son should not be included in the net wealth of the assessee under section 4(1)(a)(ii) of the Wealth-tax Act. The court emphasized that only the assets transferred, not their accretions, should be considered for inclusion. The judgment favored a strict interpretation of the law without extending the fiction beyond its clear wording, citing relevant precedents to support this interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>