<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 133 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387884</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chandigarh set aside the issue of disallowance of depreciation and additional depreciation claimed on a capital subsidy for fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the calculation of book profits under section 115JB, the ITAT ruled in favor of the Assessee, stating that the capital subsidy should not be included in the book profit calculation based on the treatment of the subsidy as a non-taxable capital receipt. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the Assessee for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 06:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 133 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387884</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chandigarh set aside the issue of disallowance of depreciation and additional depreciation claimed on a capital subsidy for fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the calculation of book profits under section 115JB, the ITAT ruled in favor of the Assessee, stating that the capital subsidy should not be included in the book profit calculation based on the treatment of the subsidy as a non-taxable capital receipt. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the Assessee for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>