<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 132 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2012-13 for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to adhere to the CIT(A)&#039;s instructions on the &#039;principle of proportion.&#039; For A.Y. 2013-14, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings regarding Rule 8D(2) clauses, dismissing both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 132 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2012-13 for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to adhere to the CIT(A)&#039;s instructions on the &#039;principle of proportion.&#039; For A.Y. 2013-14, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings regarding Rule 8D(2) clauses, dismissing both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>