<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 30 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20285</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gujarat held that a penalty paid for breaching the Customs Act is not deductible as a business expenditure, following the precedent that penalties for law breaches are not considered commercial losses. The court distinguished between lawful business infractions and inherently unlawful activities, concluding that penalties for the latter are not deductible. Despite arguments by the assessee&#039;s advocate, the court maintained that the penalty did not represent a commercial loss and could not be claimed as a deductible expense. The court certified the case as suitable for appeal to the Supreme Court for further legal scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 30 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20285</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gujarat held that a penalty paid for breaching the Customs Act is not deductible as a business expenditure, following the precedent that penalties for law breaches are not considered commercial losses. The court distinguished between lawful business infractions and inherently unlawful activities, concluding that penalties for the latter are not deductible. Despite arguments by the assessee&#039;s advocate, the court maintained that the penalty did not represent a commercial loss and could not be claimed as a deductible expense. The court certified the case as suitable for appeal to the Supreme Court for further legal scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>