<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 115 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387866</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to entertain a writ petition challenging an assessment-related order because a statutory appeal was available under Section 51 of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005. It held that examining the merits in writ jurisdiction at the first instance would render the appellate remedy redundant. The petitioner was therefore directed to pursue the statutory appeal rather than seek immediate writ intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 06:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 115 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387866</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to entertain a writ petition challenging an assessment-related order because a statutory appeal was available under Section 51 of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005. It held that examining the merits in writ jurisdiction at the first instance would render the appellate remedy redundant. The petitioner was therefore directed to pursue the statutory appeal rather than seek immediate writ intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>