<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1937 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284135</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the appellant&#039;s vehicles were used in transportation activities, making them eligible for a higher depreciation rate. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the higher depreciation rate for the vehicles, following a precedent set in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2019 18:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1937 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284135</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the appellant&#039;s vehicles were used in transportation activities, making them eligible for a higher depreciation rate. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the higher depreciation rate for the vehicles, following a precedent set in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>