<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1720 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284146</link>
    <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was sought in a complaint under the CGST Act involving allegations of fake firms, fake invoices, and substantial tax evasion. The Court treated the seriousness of the alleged GST fraud and the prior dismissal of bail to a co-accused as relevant considerations in assessing the request. On that basis, regular bail was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1720 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284146</link>
      <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was sought in a complaint under the CGST Act involving allegations of fake firms, fake invoices, and substantial tax evasion. The Court treated the seriousness of the alleged GST fraud and the prior dismissal of bail to a co-accused as relevant considerations in assessing the request. On that basis, regular bail was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>