<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 102 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387853</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding Long Term Capital Loss on the transfer of preference shares, dismissing the appeal. The Court found the transaction genuine based on documentary evidence, including allotment letters and share certificates, and noted the absence of a motive for a sham transaction. As the Tribunal&#039;s finding was factual and not perverse, no substantial question of law arose, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 20:54:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 102 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387853</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding Long Term Capital Loss on the transfer of preference shares, dismissing the appeal. The Court found the transaction genuine based on documentary evidence, including allotment letters and share certificates, and noted the absence of a motive for a sham transaction. As the Tribunal&#039;s finding was factual and not perverse, no substantial question of law arose, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>