<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 74 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387825</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming that the property belonged to the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) based on the partition deed and common pool arrangement. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the tax liability of the individual HUF members and rejecting the argument of double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 74 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387825</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming that the property belonged to the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) based on the partition deed and common pool arrangement. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the tax liability of the individual HUF members and rejecting the argument of double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>