<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 69 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of drawback claims and confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration, inflating values, and illegal benefits. Penalties imposed on individuals were set aside as retracted statements lacked corroborative evidence. Procedural fairness was emphasized with a reassessment of evidence. The appeal abated upon the death of an appellant. Penalties were overturned for lack of evidence, ensuring legal principles were followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 69 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of drawback claims and confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration, inflating values, and illegal benefits. Penalties imposed on individuals were set aside as retracted statements lacked corroborative evidence. Procedural fairness was emphasized with a reassessment of evidence. The appeal abated upon the death of an appellant. Penalties were overturned for lack of evidence, ensuring legal principles were followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>