<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Manufacturer-Service Provider Wins CENVAT Credit Case; Dual Role Doesn&#039;t Affect Credit Eligibility Under Tax Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49996</link>
    <description>CENVAT Credit - appellant was acting in dual capacity i.e. as manufacturer and also service provider - Merely because the appellant themselves are the paint manufacturers and raised invoices in their own name but for HPCL site, they cannot be denied the Cenvat credit of duty paid by them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:54:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:54:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Manufacturer-Service Provider Wins CENVAT Credit Case; Dual Role Doesn&#039;t Affect Credit Eligibility Under Tax Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49996</link>
      <description>CENVAT Credit - appellant was acting in dual capacity i.e. as manufacturer and also service provider - Merely because the appellant themselves are the paint manufacturers and raised invoices in their own name but for HPCL site, they cannot be denied the Cenvat credit of duty paid by them.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:54:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>