https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387805 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellant, engaged in both manufacturing and service provision, was justified in availing credit for paints cleared to themselves for providing services. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's objection, stating that the appellant's dual capacity allowed for credit use without a one-to-one correlation. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief on 20/09/2019. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:54:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387805 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the appellant, engaged in both manufacturing and service provision, was justified in availing credit for paints cleared to themselves for providing services. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's objection, stating that the appellant's dual capacity allowed for credit use without a one-to-one correlation. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief on 20/09/2019. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387805