<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 53 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387804</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHANDIGARH ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to avail Cenvat credit on outward transportation for FOR destination sales. The Tribunal held that the place of removal should be considered the buyer&#039;s location if goods were delivered as per purchase orders, entitling the seller to claim the credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following higher forum decisions and noted that the appellants, as consignees until delivery at the buyer&#039;s factory gate, were eligible for the credit. The impugned orders denying the credit were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 53 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387804</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHANDIGARH ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to avail Cenvat credit on outward transportation for FOR destination sales. The Tribunal held that the place of removal should be considered the buyer&#039;s location if goods were delivered as per purchase orders, entitling the seller to claim the credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following higher forum decisions and noted that the appellants, as consignees until delivery at the buyer&#039;s factory gate, were eligible for the credit. The impugned orders denying the credit were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>