<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 29 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387780</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found no deliberate concealment of income by the Assessee, as major additions were deleted by the Commissioner and sufficient explanations were provided for the remaining amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 29 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387780</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found no deliberate concealment of income by the Assessee, as major additions were deleted by the Commissioner and sufficient explanations were provided for the remaining amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>