<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 28 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings due to the invalid assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The reasons recorded for reopening the assessment were found to be based on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind and lacked the necessary tangible material to form a valid belief of income escaping assessment. Consequently, the additions made by the Assessing Officer were also invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:31:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 28 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings due to the invalid assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The reasons recorded for reopening the assessment were found to be based on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind and lacked the necessary tangible material to form a valid belief of income escaping assessment. Consequently, the additions made by the Assessing Officer were also invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>