<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 27 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain an addition of Rs. 19,85,000 out of the total Rs. 26,65,000 unexplained cash deposits. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s order well-founded, considering the remand report, additional evidence, and statements. It emphasized verifying evidence and taking action against those providing false affidavits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:27:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 27 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain an addition of Rs. 19,85,000 out of the total Rs. 26,65,000 unexplained cash deposits. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s order well-founded, considering the remand report, additional evidence, and statements. It emphasized verifying evidence and taking action against those providing false affidavits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>