<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 23 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, ruling that the respondents were eligible for the benefit of FTA Notification 010/2008-Cus. dated 15.1.2008. The FTA certificates were produced before filing Bills of Entry, and the Customs Act allowed for amendments based on existing documentary evidence at clearance. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the duty exemption for the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 23 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, ruling that the respondents were eligible for the benefit of FTA Notification 010/2008-Cus. dated 15.1.2008. The FTA certificates were produced before filing Bills of Entry, and the Customs Act allowed for amendments based on existing documentary evidence at clearance. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the duty exemption for the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>