<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 8 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20264</link>
    <description>Managing director remuneration is assessable under the head &quot;Salary&quot; where the company&#039;s articles of association place the managing director under the board&#039;s control and supervision and permit removal by shareholder resolution. These features establish an employer-employee, or master-servant, relationship, distinguishing remuneration earned in employment from income taxable under &quot;Other sources&quot;. Applying the control-and-supervision test recognised in Ram Prashad v. CIT, the High Court treated the board&#039;s supervisory authority and the removal power as decisive indicators of employment. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, confirming salary assessment of the remuneration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:01:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 8 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20264</link>
      <description>Managing director remuneration is assessable under the head &quot;Salary&quot; where the company&#039;s articles of association place the managing director under the board&#039;s control and supervision and permit removal by shareholder resolution. These features establish an employer-employee, or master-servant, relationship, distinguishing remuneration earned in employment from income taxable under &quot;Other sources&quot;. Applying the control-and-supervision test recognised in Ram Prashad v. CIT, the High Court treated the board&#039;s supervisory authority and the removal power as decisive indicators of employment. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, confirming salary assessment of the remuneration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>