https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387764 The appeal filed by the Revenue against a CESTAT order under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court considered issues such as the sustainability of the final order, perversity in the impugned order, validity of holding a firm as not a dummy, reliability of a deceased person's statement, compliance with parameters for clandestine clearance, and the threshold limit for SSI exemption in clandestine removal charge. The appeal was dismissed based on the appellant-Revenue's application seeking withdrawal due to revised monetary limits for filing appeals and the personal penalty amount being below the threshold limit. en-us Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:03:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387764 The appeal filed by the Revenue against a CESTAT order under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court considered issues such as the sustainability of the final order, perversity in the impugned order, validity of holding a firm as not a dummy, reliability of a deceased person's statement, compliance with parameters for clandestine clearance, and the threshold limit for SSI exemption in clandestine removal charge. The appeal was dismissed based on the appellant-Revenue's application seeking withdrawal due to revised monetary limits for filing appeals and the personal penalty amount being below the threshold limit. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387764