<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 47 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20263</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the income of the assessee&#039;s wife was includible in the assessee&#039;s income u/s 64(1)(ii) as she did not possess any technical or professional qualifications. The court held that the term &quot;concern&quot; in section 64(1)(ii) includes both business and professional concerns, and &quot;substantial interest&quot; encompasses having 100% interest in proprietary concerns. The interpretation of &quot;technical or professional qualifications&quot; required specific knowledge and experience, and both conditions in the proviso to section 64(1)(ii) must be met for income attribution. Ultimately, the outcome favored the Revenue over the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 47 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20263</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the income of the assessee&#039;s wife was includible in the assessee&#039;s income u/s 64(1)(ii) as she did not possess any technical or professional qualifications. The court held that the term &quot;concern&quot; in section 64(1)(ii) includes both business and professional concerns, and &quot;substantial interest&quot; encompasses having 100% interest in proprietary concerns. The interpretation of &quot;technical or professional qualifications&quot; required specific knowledge and experience, and both conditions in the proviso to section 64(1)(ii) must be met for income attribution. Ultimately, the outcome favored the Revenue over the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>